MLE Assignment Essay

1. Ethically, is brain death non as last-place as cardiac death? Why or why not? Brain death is final. There is no approach back from it, ever. Neurons die, and the brain ceases to function. Permanently. With cardiac death, we can sometimes use practice of medicine or electricity to resume heart function. A systole (no electrical occupation in the heart) can sometimes be reversed if the underlying bugger off of the problem can be treated (such as severe electrolyte abnormalities, or severe hypothermia).2. How does the Prudent Person Rule apply in this field? The prudent rule or probable man law dictates that a person act in a manner that is consistent with the skills, logic, resources, and noesis that an average lay-person may have. In medicine, it would apply to a patient in that they are required to take all steps that are apt and prudent to affect a positive outcome in their treatment. In other words, you would be expected to follow doctors orders, do all routine follow up and home therapy, use reasonable judgments and so on. So the answer here is, yes this does apply to the case because this two-year-old girl came into the hospital for a simple surgery removing her tonsils, adenoids, and extra sinus tissues. And was shortly determined brain dead after beginning to tend profusely, and went through cardiac arrest, meaning the serious dysfunction of an organ.3. In your opinion, could this cataclysm have been prevented? If so, how? In this case I really dont know the specifics of this particular case, because there are so many absentminded pieces between the pre-op and post-op that Im unsure of how this actually happened to determine if this tragedy could have been prevented. In some cases the parents have to be completely sure as to the ramifications of a situation before making a final decision.