Descartes :: essays research papers

FoundationIn Descartes venture VI Of the existence of material things, and of the hearty distinction between the real soul and body of man, he explains he reasoning for believing that the sound judgement is better cognize than any body.Descartes states his reasoning through various assumptions that he has made in his search for agniseledge. Descartes is a philosopher, who through thinking comes to these conclusions.In the reading of Descartes he interprets his ascertaining of how and why the mind is better known than the body. He states that, Myself in my entirety in as much as I am formed of body and soul (mind) taught by nature, sun, stars, and sky. Descartes accomplished that he could learn things from his body. Things like pain if he couplees a consume or pleasure if he drinks a cup of wine. With senses Descartes could see textures and well-favoured landscapes. This made Descartes execute that from this generalization that he has made, what he learns from his body doe s not exceed what he already knows in his mind. I think Descartes story is well made in his quote above. I come to understand this though, through the fact that the minds common sense is what tells me I should not touch a flame, because of the pain it will bring me. Through Descartes studies of himself, he besides came to the conclusion that, Mind alone, not mind and body in conjunction, is a requisite to a knowledge of the truth in regard to such(prenominal) things.(376) He explains this premise with the analogy, Although stars make no larger an impression on my eye than the flame of a little nookiedle thither is nonetheless in me no real or positive propensity impel me to believe that it is not greater than the flame but I go through judged it to be from my earliest years, without any rational foundation. This analogy interprets that, just because there is no direct effect upon his the body or physical senses it does not mean that nothing exists. The mind is more important to think and realize the possibilities even though his body cannot sense them. So even though the flame looks the same size as the star his mind know it in fact is not. I can only understand so much of this statement by Descartes. I understand that that his mind can differentiate the star from the star, but this is not preconceived knowledge presumption to him at birth.