Case Briefs Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Case Briefs - Essay Exampleision in the try outship of Appeals and stated commercial temperament of the parody rendered it presumptively unfair under the first of four factors (LII p.4). However, the supreme Court ruled that the Appeals Court had error in its judgment. Therefore, case the case went from district court, to Appeals court and at last to the Supreme Court.The Supreme Court reasoned that the decision ought to be reached upon consideration of several factors. One, the character and yet the purpose of that use two, the amount of the work used in the creation of a parody. Finally, the effects and the nature of the copyrighted material.This case was filed at the district court in Texas involving two firms where mascot characters were the center of the issue. Barney was a character associated with the Lyons partnership while Ted Giannoulas had a chicken as its mascot. The plaintiff complained that the defendant had false association trademark-dilution as well as unfair c ompetition (Texas paralegal Journal p.2).In the first hearing, the district judge rule that the plaintiff was not able to proof beyond reasonable doubts how the defendant had infringed on trademark. The plaintiffs concern was that the defendants portrayal of Barney as weak and relied on the chicken for bounce lessons was tantamount to unfair competition. When the judgment was delivered, the plaintiff was dissatisfied and appealed the ruling (Texas paralegal Journal p.4).The issues raised by the plaintiff at the district court included by using a Barney-like mascot, there would be consumer confusion hence unfair competition. Additionally, the firm complained of portraying it in bad light by misusing a barney-like mascot on the stage. Apparently, the mascot would be slapped, kicked and even stood on.The district court ruled that there was no evidence able to sustain a consumer-confusion case. This was reached after it was ruled that the defendants use of barney-like mascot was a par ody. In